Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zshrdlu's commentslogin

In a very different vein, I have read a number of books recently that feature a surprising amount of "scam and schemes":

- The Worst Hard Time by Timothy Egan, about the Dust Bowl during the Great Depression. A lot of people were scammed into settling the high plains by railroad salesmanship and other "real estate" scams.

- The Indifferent Stars Above by Daniel James Brown. A book about the harrowing Donner Party. Scamming and scheming are what draw them out to that expedition.

- The Guns of August by Barbara Tuchman. WW1 history but it boils down to the scheming of various men in the respective countries.

- The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power, Daniel Yergin. The oil rush from America to the World. Scheming features prominently to say the least.


Nothing wrong really if the python in turn uses libraries with c bindings or something.


Not at all true for most developing countries, they borrow despite the high interest. It just means that the burden of interest payments squeeze out welfare programs, development programs, etc. Usually the IMF/World Bank step in to influence austerity measures, fiscal and monetary policy for further loans to be disbursed.


Well you gotta recharge it of course, just not with a power cord.


Checkmate of a move asking for the passport along with the resume. The latter should stand in for the former before an offer is made.


I made the same comment last month or the month before. It's super sketchy that they would require a passport as part of the application process before an offer is even made!


I think for some people it's an aesthetic knee-jerk reaction and the fact that it's "unusual" for a programming language. It's not like their brains "can't grok" -- it's just syntax after all. People don't tend to have that reaction to xml for some reason. It's data, so it gets a pass. But then this is code-as-data and they have to break that barrier conceptually and then get past the aesthetic knee-jerk reaction.


Ted Kaczynski specifically was advocating for primitivity, no?


Supposedly. If the productivity boost is good for commercial software it's good for open source.


I will attempt a reductio ad absurdum: why do anything other than print dollars then? Why farm? Why build anything? Why not just use the magic wand all the way?


Why are you assuming the worst version of my argument to argue against?


Yeah casual extraordinary claim, I'm equally stumped.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: