Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more underdeserver's commentslogin

So you have a cluttered list of terminal tabs instead of a cluttered list of windows.

But with a worse UX?


This is the thing - my window manager can manage windows just fine. I suppose you can make the argument that managing multiple terminals in a tab is a better experience than managing multiple windows in my window manager, but that depends heavily on the terminal being used and the window manager being used.

As a devils advocate in response to all the comments claiming TUIs are fine, maybe consider TUIs mostly do not come with many of the advantages of using a terminal CLI app - you can't pipe data into them, out of them, spawn them and collect the output, etc like you can with the usual stuff you run in a terminal.

IOW, they are a reduced functionality of a GUI - resizing works poorly, scrolling works poorly, UI affordances are poor (sure, you can grey out a button, but drag-n-drop hardly ever works between your various terminal tabs, and the smallest UI element is a full character block, unlike a GUI where you can have indicators that are smaller than a character, mini-windows, etc), lack of widgets, etc.

The lightweight argument is not so good either - look at Claude Code, after all. If you want lightweight GUIs, you can do that too.

The only argument that stands is the ssh one, but if working via a remote connection, I'm not going to want a full functionality application anyway - why would I prefer a wordstar/wordperfect interface to a complex document over a GUI interface? For simple documents, sure, TUI all the way, but when I have multiple panes (outline, minimap, status bars, toolbars, etc), it performs poorly in a TUI.

TUIs are making a resurgence, sure, but only in the context of developers and development.


Whether or not you can pipe information into a TUI is a function of the implementation of it. I've written command line apps that are dual function. When you invoke them with no arguments, they launch the TUI, but when you pass an argument, you can get them to behave like a normal CLI. I don't think this is the norm, but there's no reason it couldn't be more widespread, I don't think.


Your argument in favour of TUIs is that they can be, in fact, not TUIs and actually CLIs


They can be both!


They generally stay supported, or if not supported, working.


Yes, they can, because I don't think other forges are actually making money.

GitHub is the de facto standard.


Yep, and given that the original author posted it in 2020, should probably be marked (2020).


Loved the Zelda reference.


Whose influence?


The first friend gets to share their experience with the group, that can then decide to keep buying for other members or not.


“Sorry y’all, now that I have mine I gotta say, not worth the price”


Yeah strike me off the birthday gift list



It is not the worst time, but also not the best time at all. Things can get and actually get both better and worst over time.

Dont use hedonistic treadmill theory to devalue what people actually say. Having crap we dont care loosing available does not mean everything is consistently better.


It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way – in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.


The author's alleged misdeeds aside, even before AI, there were lots of small projects that were similar to one another.

I don't think that's a bad thing, or that it's necessarily plagiarism - unless the LLM spews out the other project's code from its training...

I'm happy to see multiple takes on the same idea. There are lots of tiny aesthetic and functional decisions that make apps different from one another. Now that implementation is cheaper we should celebrate that.


There's a huge difference between misusing their power and not having perfect understanding of what they're allowed and not allowed to do.

I'm sure there are scenarios where the cop can confiscate the surfboard and the car. The distinction is probably somewhat vague even for highly educated lawyers, and cops cannot expected to be that.

He should have stood up for his rights, sure, but laughing in the cop's face and telling them they're full of shit is disrespectful, and at least where I live is a misdemeanor even if the original case is wrong.


As a citizen, when I have an incomplete understanding of what I'm allowed and not allowed to do I have every incentive to stay on the side of things I'm sure I am allowed to do. Just threatening to do things that you are not allowed to do has the annoying tendency of being a crime

I'm not sure how this suddenly flips for cops


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: