Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | stevehawk's commentslogin

didn't it take legal threats from the EU to ultimately make it happen?


Yeah, and I’ve yet to make any use of this feature. Nice to have, but let’s not pretend RCS is that big of a deal in any way.


i feel like that's the point with LLMs or i'm misreading your comment.


yes they did. and they voted for another trade war. they're amazingly dependable for voting against their own self interests.



worth it for a lifetime of looking over your shoulder? maybe...


If you believe the conspiracy theories, that Boeing whistleblower “took his own life” before testimony and any potential payout.


so use the cheap model to do the work and the expensive domestic model to audit?


Or I can just use the domestic model, accepting that I'm paying some premium in order to reduce the complexity of my dependencies and the amount of time I have to spend thinking about supply chain risk. It's the same reason I don't buy things from Alibaba even though many things I buy from Amazon are surely available there for less.


You use “use the model” as if it was equal to “paid some guys to run inference on their hardware”.


* can't (?)


Edited, Thanks.


people are still buying tf2 loot boxes?


The lootboxes drop as a normal course of gameplay, you buy keys to open them. People still play TF2 so presumably some still open boxes. It's also the base unit of trading for high value items.


why would NATO join the attacks? NATO is a defensive agreement, not a "kick a hornets nest and drag your former friends into it" agreement


> why would NATO join the attacks

I don't disagree, but the expectation from the US Admin was some of their NATO allies would join (like they did in Afghanistan, Syria, and Iraq). Especially since the Oil spike hurts Europe (where the NATO nations are) the most.

> NATO is a defensive agreement

Turkey was attacked by Iran, though, it is unclear if Turkey would have invoked Art5 even if Iran had kept escalating.


but elon said he would share the excesses with us!


just means they will install more cameras to capture driver faces or buy cellphone data


Cellphone data is not sufficient to prove who is operating a vehicle


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: