Every $1 they invest brings back $100 in their valuation maybe.

But even that isn't really true since Nvidia P/E was unreasonably high even 4 years ago. So how is this not lying to investors (a thing that is illegal)?

Because a PE is a fact not an interpretation.

It's interesting how people who stare only at P/E make consistently bad investment decisions. Perhaps P/E is not such an important indicator overall?

I agree. But that still doesn't make it a lie or illegal.

We already have the answer to many of these questions.

Neither with horses

Good point. We need to genetically modify horses that can pollinate plants and create honey.

GMO hyper competitive feral cat colonies that ignore birds and pollinate gmo soybeans whilst collecting for their kitten hives. Each claw is of course a stinger. What could go wrong.

"Ohh, soo cute! Here little kitty! OMG... RUN!!!"

yay, horse vomit.

Grape and aspergus, we all get it

tell that to the 90% of belgians with deficiency

Just like cloud vs private server. It'll be based on use case.

Some open source models will cross the chasm, some big ai providers will too, and in both case they will have their specific use cases.

On the OP link, they compare themselves to the capabilities of leaderboard AI's and beat them.

Just need to open the link to answer that question.

Buildings are built to resist earthquakes. Outside, anything (electric poles, roof tiles...) can fall on you.

Shards of glass falling from ten stories up would be one of the main things to try to avoid.