Nice! Not 100% sure, but it reads very human to me. The only LLM-ism that jumped out at me was "An honest note before we continue", but that was the only time the word "honest" appeared. If it's not human-written it does an exceptionally good job of appearing so.
Let me clarify: this was written by one person, by me. However, I received help with spelling mistakes, false friends, and a few connectors.
Thank you!
Do the caveats mean that it could _not_ actually have had fast builds on all the platforms it supports? (Honestly asking if I connected the dots correctly here, this is not a snarky "actually" rethorical question...)
It's entirely possible that is actually what they wanted (at least what the people in the company they were talking to wanted). I suspect that "we understood to mean" is language carefully designed to avoid a lawsuit.
Sort of. It won't be save between machines, for example, as chrome's implementation does. If Firefox crashes, most of th time it is lost. It is also not as clean as chrome's native implementation. I have tried it.
>and honestly? "Molt" fits perfectly - it's what lobsters do to grow.
So do we think Anthropic or the artist formerly known as Clawdbot paid for the tokens to have Claude write this tweet announcing the rename of a Product That Is Definitely Not Claude?
