PNG is on my list to visit.
It’s relatively complex to get to. Most flights either leave from Australia or Jakarta, they don’t run frequently enough to where you will probably spend the night in Jakarta or Australia in order to catch the flight the next day.
I visited Timor Leste earlier this year and what an interesting country
It seems astonishing to me that a "relatively complex" intercontinental trip these days means "have to spend a whole night waiting for the next flight".
the additional complexity is visas and immigration for that country.
I’m American, so I have to pay $35 every time I enter Indonesia and I’m limited to the number times per year I can enter the country.
Australia is easier. Just need to fill out ETA for a $20AUD fee.
The extra night also eats into your limited vacation time. 18 hours in addition to the 20 hours flying means you’re losing almost 4 days of your trip just transiting.
Also, my flights aren’t intercontinental. I did this monkey dance going from tp hcmc to Timor Leste.
I read about a Japanese flying to Indonesia in 1959 (the president of the country was courting her). She flew from Tokyo to Hong Kong, then to Bangkok, then to Singapore before making the last hop to Jakarta.
I tend to fly cheaply with multiple transfers/layovers. What I figured out recently is that it is nice to combine the flights in such a way that one of the layovers is _longer_.
When the airport has a good connection to a major city then 12 hours during the day are enough, but I'm happy to bump it to 2-3 days.
I have managed to visit some Chinese and Canadian cities this way and it was both more interesting and much cheaper than taking a direct flight.
I wish I could share photos. Food is insanely cheap. I had street fried chicken, rice, and I think two sides for literally one US dollar.
Their primary currency usd.
They have all the child labor problems that other countries in the region have.
Everybody seems to know each other.
Unlike French colonialized countries, Vietnam, Timor Leste is proudly and vibrantly Portuguese. Similar to Macau but not as wealthy.
The public transit system is basically a tiny van that just drives around in loops around the city. You wave the driver down, jump in, and then tap your money against the metal framing when you’re ready to get off (there are no bus stops). I don’t know if you’ve been to Kenya, but it was like very similar to the vans in Kenya, except even smaller.
What's your criteria for mundane? Basically every decent sized island in that part of the world is going to have beautiful beaches, coral reefs, mountains, and jungles.
Crypto scammers have long operated in Cambodia, Philippines, Myanmar after being kicked out of China, and were looking to go to Sri Lanka and Timor Leste next - but Timor Leste's politicians and population got together and fought back successfully, it seems:
I actually visited abandoned scam centers a couple weeks ago in Bavet, Cambodia. It’s really Erie now.
All the units had air conditioning units, which I thought was sweet, considering many Cambodians don’t have that. But the prison bars on the windows and barbed wire surrounding the complex was a bit uncomfortable to see.
I have a home server running vibed applications. VPS host would cost $25/mo or $300/yr.
Mac mini can also build iOS applications. I think if you’re a mobile dev, you can have concurrent builds for your agents instead of everyone waiting on a single machine to finish.
I only use frontier models to vibe code iOS apps, as I'm not an iOS developer. I haven't tried the local models post qwen coder 3.5 release for all the reasons.
AFAIK, a limiter for iOS engineers (and AI agents) for concurrent feature development is the xcode environment and hardware limits. BE engineers can easily have 3 agents working on 3 different microservices (or gitwork trees), but iOS devs can basically only manage one version of the code at a time, due to externalized state (like derived data and bundle ids).
I've played quite a few hours of Blizzard games throughout the years and as much as I loved the starcraft universe RTS is just not approachable for me. So I can vouch as one person who is really excited to get a taste of the universe outside the RTS genre.
That said, whether the game itself will be good is still TBD.
Also all the hot people can find each other now because of the dating apps and when people are below a certain level of ugliness they don’t want to date each other anymore.
There’s some truth to it. You can now easily meet people in a 100 mile radius, that wasn’t the case until about 20 years ago. Personality matters when people get to see it, not when you make snap decisions based on an image in half a second when you swipe.
I’ve been married for 15 years. When I found my wife even dating apps were much more slow paced, I just feel for the current generation.
This seems like an excuse/conspiracy theory. Hot people could always find hot people: go to where hot people hang out (clubs, hipster bars, art galleries, yoga, etc). What has definitely increased is access to people complaining about hot people not dating them.
I was trying to learn more about your project. The comment above was digestiable for me as a non-healthcare person, but the website is really difficult for me to understand.
The web design (and text?) really come off as ChatGPT written, which lowers my interest in spending time to understand it.
I’m trying to imagine where a Waymo passenger (the one “operating” the vehicle, commanding the AI to drive from A to B) being held responsible for the car doing something illegal on the way to achieve that goal.
Do you really think that the passenger should be responsible for how the car/agent achieves the goal, when they only set the destination?
Giving passenger override controls and monitoring seems to defeat the purpose of self driving cars if you’re still required to hold a driver license to use them.
Let's continue with the analogy, so in the event of a Waymo running over a pedestrian - who is held responsible?
Probably not the end user, who ordered the Waymo and couldn't reasonably foresee it running somebody over, with the expectation that that the Waymo would legally reach its destination. If the end user tampered with it, they should be held responsible.
An OpenAI team giving an unblocked model access to a lax harness, with instructions to find and exploit cyber bugs in a game exercise, there is probably a reasonable expectation that they can foresee the consequences. With consumer guardrails, it would not have happened.
This isn't about putting constraints on consumers and typical end users, which already have safety filters and use the product with the knowledge that it won't root their machine or start a botnot, but keeping dangerous test runs and other actors experimenting with unsafe harnesses accountable.
But it is an interesting question. When I, a typical user, use a harness and I give an innocuous prompt to my agent in its container, like making a certain refactor, and it somehow escapes and then begins a mass bot attack, there should we more grace given. As agents become more stateful and long-lived, it gets muddy.
The different is who's operating. In one case you only tell the car to get from a to b, in the other case you explicitly instruct the ai to do things. If the ai causes damages, I'd say it depends on what you prompted. Did you try to find a security hole in system X, or did you ask it for harmless information (in which case rather the ai vendor might be held accountable).
All this is not how the legal system might or might not work, of course.
When you run an agent on your computer, that's equivalent to installing self driving software into your manually driven car, i.e. something like comma.ai.
Comma.ai might be fully safe to operate autonomously on a mining site or a corporate parking lot, but maybe not in city traffic.
If you use it in problematic scenarios, that is on you.
Yes. The user of a machine is responsible for due diligence before the decision to use the machine. Unless the operational limitations and fault rate of the machine is withheld from the public.
TBH I don't really think another new technology we haven't figured out the ethics of, as an example, is going to get you very far in way of insights ...
I visited Timor Leste earlier this year and what an interesting country
reply