Related only topically, a 1hr YouTube talk I enjoyed a lot: "Hatchling T. rex and the Evolution of Vertebrate Parental Care" by Nick Longrich: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zd0dR2n9hLA
He's a paleontologist and the talk starts with some pretty interesting statistical analysis aiming to estimate T rex clutch sizes (66 eggs) and hatchling weights (1.5kg) as well as T rex parental care. It ends with looking at evolutionary history trends in increasing parental investment in radically different animals.
He talks a little slow, so a little playback speed bump won't go amiss.
... literally all of the SPAC mania was about circumventing regulation and defrauding shareholders in public markets. All of the SPACs are worth a fraction of what they were at listing. I don't see anyone being prosecuted.
Edit: I take that back, [1] this guy got prison time. Do Chamath next.
In absence of a good enforcement mechanism, it absolutely does apply. Is Slack going to strip Mullenweg of admin control in absence of court order, as long as the Slack bills are paid? It would set a terrible precedent for them to do so unilaterally. Whatever the legal process this battle follows, it will be a year or two before it's even possible for a final ruling + court order for the handover of Slack admin control to happen. That's de facto Slack control for at least a year or two.
If employees can be persuaded to move themselves + systems to a board controlled chat instance, that's an angle, but Mullenweg has stronger cards if he's liked by employees.
If the board can show they fired him and he's now accessing their systems without authorization, I don't think it's a civil matter, and criminal courts might move faster.
> It would set a terrible precedent for them to do so unilaterally.
Speaking generally (not about Automattic), big SaaS have law enforcement desks that work on exactly this type of thing, and the "terrible precedent" is already widely set. Plenty of law enforcement outreach (which includes lawyers, courts, and actual law enforcement officials) results in pre-emptive compliance by SaaS companies. I would be massively surprised if Slack has not already done this in many cases, because most huge companies routinely do.
That's neither generally good nor generally bad; whether it's the right move depends on the charge, requested actions by law enforcement, status of legal proceedings, and the values/diligence by which the SaaS business assesses the legitimacy and likely cost/benefit of a law enforcement request. Note that "pre-emptive compliance" doesn't always mean an email saying "hey, the FBI said you suck so we terminated your account". There's a broad spectrum of tools available to a SaaS ranging from sending that email, to holding bespoke contract re-negotiations (which are functionally always in process between a SaaS and a huge customer) hostage to endless redlining rounds, to enforcing ToS violations that the SaaS previously turned a blind eye towards due to customer size.
> Whatever the legal process this battle follows, it will be a year or two before it's even possible for a final ruling + court order
Preliminary injunctions can be issued in days to weeks, not months to years, in all sorts of civil and criminal cases in all sorts of jurisdictions. Those can take the form of "don't change stuff with your admin access" or "grant admin control to someone else"-type orders. In cases where a service administrator is materially involved, injunctions are also easy to get on the basis of evidence preservation.
That's a pretty sharp tool. Failure to comply with those opens individuals and businesses up to way more legal penalties and tighter timeframes. Even if an injunction is later vacated/dismissed/modified, the legal argument that you violated it because you knew that would happen is an extremely tough sell.
There's no physical reason "smartest/most capable model" should be "most yappy model". Smart people can write concisely. It's unfortunate you have to tolerate/fight yappiness to get intelligence with current SotA models.
Sublime work OP. Love the sheen control, the glossy coffee.
Since they're clearly a warhammer 40k fan, a recent discovery of mine for mini painting: artist gouache or artist watercolor are awesome for pin-lining and recess shading the way oil paint or enamels are often used for those tasks, but only water is needed instead of white spirit. And they're indefinitely "editable" with a damp brush / qtip. The only downside is that you need to varnish to seal the watercolor before painting over it. A black and a burnt umber alone will get you really far. Make sure the gouache or watercolor use a gum arabic binder.
The acrylic will set. Water will indefinitely reactivate gum arabic binder paints (gouache, watercolor) including a wet brush full of acrylic. The watercolor will move and blend with your acrylic. Nifty if it's what you intend, annoying if you liked where the watercolor was.
Steve Krug's other book, Rocket Surgery Made Easy, got me into usability tests with real users, and how to get it in place in a corporate environment. It's shocking to watch real users use software.
In a cable leaked by WikiLeaks in 2010, Amos Yadlin, former general of the Israeli Air Force, said in 2007 that Israel would be "happy" if Hamas take over Gaza and regarded it as a positive step, in order to make Gaza to be treated as a hostile state.
The details of money flow are complicated, but there are credible rumors of Israel funding Hamas via Quatar. There's a chance Hamas would have lost leadership to the Palestinian Authority had Israel not supported it during that era.
This is interesting and should make you think but it's the same issue with infiltrators/agitators in other groups. If all it takes for a group to start resorting to violence and eventually establishing as part of their identity the killing of "others", when instigated by some authority figure/small group of instigators - specially with lies and historical distortions - this itself points out that the nature of that group is problematic doesn't it?
Specially if that group has a history with thousands of terrorist attacks across all the world, even when just counting the last 25 years. It's the same if you join a left-wing group that's "just demanding" some social justice, as an undercover paid actor, and then you steer it to start killing people who are deemed "against" their objectives, or the reason they need to act. Then some people go and said they were "infiltrated", but was it so? Or was it just waiting for some nut case to come forward?
If I tell you to go kill all the cats in the neighbourhood and you go, you're as or more dangerous than I am for suggesting that isn't it so?
While I'm sure Israel is no angel it doesn't seem to be the one putting criminals in hiding near schools and civilian infrastructure and I also don't understand what people want them to do? Have no country?
So others can then do with them as they please? Like telling them to "go back to their country". While it's obviously all part of a political ploy, jews should have a right to a homeland. No-one talks about Egypt and the other surrounding countries interests in this, in having a "Palestine" identity that didn't even exist a few decades ago. In fact, if you go see the first declarations, made by some Turkish guy, looking like the brother of Abramovich, sent to Palestine at the time, there's not even mention of anything Palestine.
And lastly, it's very rich to live in countries that have benefitted from this (oil) and follow ways of life that require this, while sipping on their $15 expresso's machiatos... So in fact, perhaps there's many called "humanists" in the west that have way more blood in their hands than they would like to understand, or pretend not to, while filling their wallets and living as good samaritans. Maybe they should globalize intifada next to their homes to see if they also like living like that.
This is not to say that Israel should have the right to bulldoze, kill and take lands of others for building high-rise apartment complexes but as far as I know and seems to be documented, it was the supposed Palestinian Authority's that many times refused land agreements and split-state solutions... But I guess here in this website where most were covid infected it doesn't matter.
You missed the point. Israel banks on making Gaza look like the enemy, seeks reasons to seek war, and bets on a hostile takeover of Gaza and expulsion of the people.
At this point, Hamas’s stories are meant to feed Israel’s hunger for annihilating Gaza. No stories of dictatorship or instigation or terrorism or hostage taking or can even measure back to the violent nature of Israel. It’s not Israel “is no angel”, but Israel is this earth’s worst demon who is trying to delegitimize the Palestinians, and you are their allied propagator.
> Israel banks on making Gaza look like the enemy, seeks reasons to seek war, and bets on a hostile takeover of Gaza and expulsion of the people.
You seem to be hanging all this on what was described as a "credible rumour". To some people the idea that Jews control the weather is a credible rumour.
Well, it seems you're the one missing the point. Again you show your nature when you make it about "Israel is this earth's worst demon", surprised you didn't say the jews. Luckily we have records of the peaceful religion and translations of what their head figures say and think, in many places around the world, throughout history, along with their acts, and luckily not only by christians or catholics (in the sense that that shows us without a bias), and still going on today. In fact we have more than 1.000 years of history to confirm. While the left and its love for erasing history (goes back to Stalin's photoshopping pictures before there was photoshop) to make itself look good goes very well with Islam's political games. I don't think Israel has to make it look like the enemy, muslisms make it abundantly clear by themselves.
You fallaciously conflated what was said with religion. Religion was not mentioned anywhere. This is politics and war. And so is selfishly based on personal vendettas and agendas.
The personality of the underlying model persists even if you're able to alter surface tone enough for your needs.
An observation from a year ago: people on AI text RPG subreddits saying they had a lot of difficulty with Gemini role playing ambiguous characters and that almost always the characters would betray them, or misread the human role player's motives as negative. Someone pointed out this paper [1] that showed significant differences between the different LLMs strategic behavior playing iterated prisoner's dilemma where Gemini had exactly that behavior, and speculatively that difference was emerging in RPG character behavior.
I wish they'd used bigger models (they used gemini-2.5-flash, gpt-4o-mini, claude-3-haiku-20240307). From the abstract: Our results show that LLMs are highly competitive, consistently surviving and sometimes even proliferating in these complex ecosystems. Furthermore, they exhibit distinctive and persistent "strategic fingerprints": Google's Gemini models proved strategically ruthless, exploiting cooperative opponents and retaliating against defectors, while OpenAI's models remained highly cooperative, a trait that proved catastrophic in hostile environments. ... Later, we see that Anthropic’s Claude is more cooperative still, but nonetheless outperforms OpenAI head-to-head
Obviously Opus 5 is wildly different than Haiku 3 but I'd expect Opus 5's fundamental suspicion of user intent, and anti-sycophancy via necessarily finding something to nitpick, is still present in your styleguided output.
He's a paleontologist and the talk starts with some pretty interesting statistical analysis aiming to estimate T rex clutch sizes (66 eggs) and hatchling weights (1.5kg) as well as T rex parental care. It ends with looking at evolutionary history trends in increasing parental investment in radically different animals.
He talks a little slow, so a little playback speed bump won't go amiss.
reply