Maybe bc it completely sidesteps the question? I have a nephew who is 7yrs old who only has an iPad and i can play with him due to geysermc, which is the correct answer.

What's wrong with using https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/download/server/bedrock ? I get that consoles require subscriptions for any kind of online connectivity, but didn't think the iPad had that limitation.

You might be right, i set this up quite some time ago. I don’t think I saw bedrock dedicated servers before.

Yep. It's like someone asking "How can we make cycling in [city] safer?" and answering it with "Drive a car."

You can buy it on a black market unlike electricity.

Yes, buy crude on the black market and build your own refinery. Or you can run your own DIY fracking rig in your backyard. There must be some yt videos.

Are you suggesting we plan our global energy infrastructure based on attributes like "how well it fares in a post-apocalyptic barter economy"?

Are you thinking that there are no wars and power plants do not get destroyed? If you live in a non-nuclear country the chances are non-zero and it is not smart to depend on large, centralized, easy to destroy power plants. It actually dumb to build those large plants instead of decentralized smaller plants.

For example, a president of a certain country threatened to make a "power plant day" in another certain country.

Why are power plants considered centralised but the extraction, transport and refining of oil isn't?

With the renewable power revolution, do you think solar panels and batteries are going to be more or less centralised than oil extraction, transport and refining?

Are you familiar with how easy it is to repair the electrical grid after damage, compared to what happens to oil wells whose operations are stopped?

> Are you thinking that there are no wars and power plants do not get destroyed?

OK, but is the argument that oil refineries don't get the same treatment in war? They're also "large, centralized, easy to destroy". In fact highly flammable. It has been happening, not theoretically but actually.

It's worked for me for about 10 years. Maybe don't forget if it's so critical that you get to work the next day. Sounds like you have a skill issue

This one is so short and only has one LLM-ism, it's entirely possible it was human, I'm 60/40 on it. Unless you are 100% sure it was LLM, please don't call it out.

The funny thing is, In my whole life, this is probably the first time I have used that form, and I wrote it in a completely honest way.

I just want to bang my head to the keyboard.

Reading LLM's all day makes me really cynical, and I have to suppress the urge to judge all text written in that sense. SO I get where they are coming from, but people need to consider that they can be wrong, and that there is a real person whose feelings you can hurt by saying "OH this is like LLM, gotem!"

I can relate, because I also try to understand whether the text I'm reading is written by a human or emitted by a model constantly, and I don't use any LLMs day to day.

On the other hand, I'm not new in the internet, and have relatively thick skin. I'm very amused today by the unintentional attention I got with my cloudy, morning brain.

Nevertheless, regardless of what we do, believe or say, we shall be kind first and remember https://xkcd.com/438/ dearly.

This is what I'm trying to do all the time, but I'm not perfect. Just a human, trying his best.

It turns off if you uncheck "hokousha/pedestrian network". Based on their placement I'm pretty sure they are elevators, I wonder if they actually do have that angle.

I actually share that opinion of no comment from LLMs. I just dont want to read them. So as usual, an opinion is… an opinion.

Comments sometimes help the LLM think through a problem. They are particularly useful if you have thinking disabled, eg. it's not uncommon to run Qwen3.6 locally, but its thinking is extremely verbose, so it's fast if you disable thinking, but doing that will sometimes cause it to think a little in comments, and if you disable that too, then it will produce worse output.

Comments can always be stripped reliably later.

That is interesting, I had no idea comments were used in the process. I've only been using frontier models with maxed thinking, but this could be useful on the other end.

I use it in my guest PC, it comfortably hits 165 fps in Rocket League at 1080p. Something about using the 1080 for 1080p feels poetic.

I think everyone does this. It reminds me of a possible related phenomenon. The act of remembering what you do takes a few extra brain cells, to enable the “recording function “. If you are on complete autopilot, doing a routine task, you will often forget to turn on the recording function. Like the other day I tried to remember whther I had run the dryer and realized it had been completely optimized out of my memory.

I get that while driving home. I've driven half an hour and then realise I've been thinking about something else the entire time and cannot recall anything about the journey.

Good point. I self host headscale but it also has the ssh feature, probably also insecure.

Not necessarily, it's a clean room implementation. Even if leading dashes was known/documented/tested to implement they might have done it differently. And maybe it was an implementation detail that it was ever allowed, but that's a weird username, headscale implementation happened not to allow it, and nobody ever noticed the discrepancy.

How is that true if:

This project is not associated with Tailscale Inc.

However, one of the active maintainers for Headscale is employed by Tailscale and he is allowed to spend work hours contributing to the project. Contributions from this maintainer are reviewed by other maintainers.

Nice, this makes me feel a little better.

eh, i gotta system76 pangolin with all amd and it's been solid