Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | RobotToaster's commentslogin

It's like the John Birth society are back in charge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Un-American_Activities_C...

I'm pretty sure that's the idea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unhumans


Of course this was flagged to death by hasbara.

> and is plentiful mostly in places that are unstable or hostile to us.

Plentiful in places we keep making unstable and hostile to us by bombing.


A little history goes a long way:

https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/wars-conflicts-...

The enmity between "the West" and "the middle east" goes back to the islamic colonisation era which created a religious incentive to "fight the infidels" and/or plunder and enslave them.


I challenge you to find one time period or some states/tribes which did not plunder and enslave each other throughout history. I'm fed up with all this "oh but they did it first" - everybody did it first and that's still no reason to continue doing it with the children of their children.

In ancient times everyone plundered each other unless they were allies, it was just how the world operated at the time I think it was probably more of a survival tactic "plunder or get plundered".

Then came the next stage of plunder. 'Pay a tax and you'll be protected'

Some it was true, but most times it also cost your life. Never simple.


DRM free (and cheaper) on GOG https://www.gog.com/en/game/carrion

In board games there's "kill doctor lucky" which is reverse cluedo/clue.

You normally only see that crap on Chinese apps like Temu.

You can change the type of "mission" you get on street complete, but it definitely needs more sensible defaults.

One of the weaknesses of OSM is not requiring consumers to contribute back data like that.

Unfortunately I imagine your modern AI data centre has better security than a 19th century textile mill.

Unfortunately? Are we really at the point of supporting terrorism of the “correct” political persuasion?

We're way past it, sadly. Luigi was insanely popular for the cold blooded murder of a CEO. Hundreds of thousands of people celebrated Charlie Kirk's murder within minutes of it happening, let alone the discourse you see now, a year later. Plenty of people, even on this forum, openly advocate for "the funniest thing" happening to Elon.

Terrorism and murder are in vogue.


There's a lot of folks out there with champagne bottles and party poppers earmarked for when it happens.

No mention of a certain president and his cultists coup-ing the government to steal an election? Definitely sounded like terrorism at the time, with clear call to eliminating a vice president and other representatives

Sounds like a great reason to oppose violent rhetoric and action before it becomes normalized.

It has been normalized over the past 10y by the sitting president

The president that has faced three distinct assassination attempts in the past two years?

Yes. If you're exposed to one entrenched end of the spectrum or another, you might notice the rhetoric and threats have picked up quite a bit on both sides. Language and actions are becoming more divisive and more violent.

I increasingly hear insane not-in-passing phrases like "Someone should just [commit some violent act to further the speaker's political beliefs]." Lately, it's about sabotaging data centers and killing CEOs.

And it's not just talk, this stuff starts by motivating the loonier members of a group to commit acts like mass shootings, the Charlie Kirk assassination, violence against LGBTQ people and other targeted groups, and so on.

I feel like some weird outsider, sitting in center-left.


We have an 8 hour workday, and women's suffrage, thanks to "terrorism", as you call it.

What social good do you intend to secure by attacking data centers?

How exactly do you propose going about that?


Uh, no, those things did not arise out of terrorism.


Violence works, and it's increasingly coming to be understood that voting no longer does...

Are we at the point where we allow companies to just hack other companies and do nothing about it?

Yes, money is God and companies are his saints. Keep your head down and surrender everything to them


So it's fine for corporations to buy politicians, force data centers on communities that do not want them, impoverish those communities with higher energy and water prices, and poison their water supply with discharge? But when those communities fight back it's terrorism?

Real life isn't as simple as the one in fairy tales, there's usually more than one villain.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: